Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT00733330

Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement - Navigated Versus Non-navigated Study

Computer Assisted Navigation in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing the Alignment Achieved Using the DePuy Ci Minimally Invasive (Mi) Versus the DePuy Non Navigated Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86 (actual)
Sponsor
DePuy International · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the precision of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure. The secondary objectives of this investigation are to: Compare the accuracy of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure. Compare the number of optimal implantations achieved by the two types of procedure. Compare the clinical performance of the knee replacement in subjects who have undergone one of the two types of procedure. Compare the functional outcome achieved by subjects who have undergone one of the two types of procedure. Compare the interface radiographic appearance 5 years post-operatively between the two types of procedure. Compare the accuracy and precision of long leg alignment achieved by the two types of procedure 5 years post-operatively, i.e., at final follow-up and also the change in accuracy and precision between the final follow-up and baseline. Compare the Adverse Events experienced by the subjects who have undergone the two types of procedure.

Detailed description

Primary endpoint: to compare the precision of the long leg alignment of the Ci MiTKA vs. the non navigated conventional TKA, specifically 3 months to demonstrate the variability of the mechanical axis. Secondary endpoints: to compare the precision of the long leg alignment of the Ci MiTKA vs. the non navigated conventional TKA specifically to demonstrate the proportion of procedures that fall within a satisfactory alignment window in either group.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEEither P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee replacement using the conventional surgical approach and manual surgical techniqueOrthopaedic implants for total knee replacement implanted with a standard approach using standard instrumentation
DEVICEEither P.F.C. Sigma or L.C.S. Complete knee replacement using minimally invasive surgical approach and computer navigationOrthopaedic implants for total knee replacement implanted with a minimally invasive approach and computer navigation

Timeline

Start date
2005-01-01
Primary completion
2008-12-01
Completion
2010-12-01
First posted
2008-08-13
Last updated
2014-08-15
Results posted
2014-08-15

Locations

5 sites across 3 countries: United States, Australia, New Zealand

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00733330. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.