Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00677274

Epidural Analgesia in Different Cervix Diameter and the Rate of Cesarean Delivery

Epidural Labor Analgesia in Different Cervical Dilation Diameter and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
780 (actual)
Sponsor
Nanjing Medical University · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Epidural analgesia in the early stage of labor at cervix \< 4.0cm was considered as a risk period for increasing the rate of cesarean delivery. The more recent studies and the investigators' previous data indicated epidural analgesia can be performed as early as the cervical dilation approximately 2.0cm. The investigators hypothesized that different cervix diameter had different rate of cesarean delivery. This trial would investigate the correlation amongst different cervical dilation and the risk of cesarean section in nulliparous women at term.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the onset of regular uterine contraction
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 0.5cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 1.0cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 1.5cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 2.0cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 3.0cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 4.0cm
PROCEDUREEpidural labor analgesiaEpidural analgesia initiated at the cervix diameter 5.0cm

Timeline

Start date
2008-05-01
Primary completion
2008-08-01
Completion
2008-08-01
First posted
2008-05-14
Last updated
2009-02-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00677274. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.