Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT00457327

Pilot Study for Evaluation of the Need for Protective Ileostomy After Low Anterior Resection Due to Rectal Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
Heidelberg University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether protective ileostomy is required after low anterior resection due to rectal cancer

Detailed description

Since introduction of total mesorectal excision prognosis and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer of the middle or lower third of the rectum could be improved significantly. There is no valid data about the need of protective ileostomy in these patients. About 10% of the patients develop insufficiency of the anastomosis and might benefit from ileostomy whereas about 90% would not have required protective ileostomy retrospectively. Aim of the study is to show that protective ileostomy is not required if several criteria are fulfilled and early measures in case of clinical impairment are defined. Therefore eligibility criteria include safely performed stapler anastomosis with complete rings and control of impermeability by air insufflation. In the event of clinical impairment in the postoperative course CT scan with KM filling of the rectum to exclude insufficiency of the anastomosis will be performed. In case of insufficiency protective ileostomy will be created. 40 patients will be included. Comparison: Patients with resectable rectal cancer of the middle or lower third will be intraoperatively randomized to either protective ileostomy or no ileostomy at all.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREprotective ileostomy

Timeline

Start date
2006-07-01
Primary completion
2007-03-01
Completion
2007-03-01
First posted
2007-04-06
Last updated
2008-06-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00457327. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.