Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00190164
Alleviated Positioning for Small Macular Holes
Evaluation of the Success Rate of a Procedure Without Strict Positioning Post Surgical Versus With Positioning Face Towards the Strict Ground, at Patients Presenting a Macular Hole. Study of Non-Inferiority.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 69 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients. Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning. Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning. Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.
Detailed description
Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients. Main Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning. Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning. Primary outcome: Frequency of the successes defined by anatomical closing. Secondary objectives: To show the non inferiority of the technique without positioning by the following variables: - ETDRS visual acuity in the third postoperative month. - Progression of cataract - Frequency of the complications. Design of the study: Randomized multicentric study, in parallel groups, open, with individual benefit for the patient. Number of subjects and duration of the study: 68 patients, divided into two parallel groups, of more than 18 years, presenting a hole ≤ 400 µm, will be included and followed over a period of 3 months. The estimated total duration of the study is 27 months. Data analysis: In the case of this equivalence clinical trial the margin of non inferiority was fixed at 15%. The secondary criteria will consequently be analyzed. Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning | Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning |
| PROCEDURE | Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning | Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2005-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2007-11-01
- Completion
- 2008-06-01
- First posted
- 2005-09-19
- Last updated
- 2008-07-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00190164. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.