Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00190164

Alleviated Positioning for Small Macular Holes

Evaluation of the Success Rate of a Procedure Without Strict Positioning Post Surgical Versus With Positioning Face Towards the Strict Ground, at Patients Presenting a Macular Hole. Study of Non-Inferiority.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69 (actual)
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients. Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning. Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning. Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.

Detailed description

Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients. Main Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning. Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning. Primary outcome: Frequency of the successes defined by anatomical closing. Secondary objectives: To show the non inferiority of the technique without positioning by the following variables: - ETDRS visual acuity in the third postoperative month. - Progression of cataract - Frequency of the complications. Design of the study: Randomized multicentric study, in parallel groups, open, with individual benefit for the patient. Number of subjects and duration of the study: 68 patients, divided into two parallel groups, of more than 18 years, presenting a hole ≤ 400 µm, will be included and followed over a period of 3 months. The estimated total duration of the study is 27 months. Data analysis: In the case of this equivalence clinical trial the margin of non inferiority was fixed at 15%. The secondary criteria will consequently be analyzed. Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREMacular hole surgery with alleviated positioningMacular hole surgery with alleviated positioning
PROCEDUREMacular hole surgery with no alleviated positioningMacular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning

Timeline

Start date
2005-08-01
Primary completion
2007-11-01
Completion
2008-06-01
First posted
2005-09-19
Last updated
2008-07-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00190164. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.