Prolapse; Female

15 registered clinical trials studyying Prolapse; Female — 4 currently recruiting.

Status	Trial	Sponsor	Phase
Recruiting	Transvaginal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Prolapse Treatment NCT06404931	Hospital Mutua de Terrassa	Phase 2
Completed	Pre-operative Polyethylene Glycol 3350 for Minimally Invasive Urogynecologic Surgery NCT06159777	University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center	Phase 4
Recruiting	Functional Links Between the Temporomandibular Joint and the Pelvis in Gynecology NCT05978414	Poznan University of Physical Education	N/A
Active Not Recruiting	Barbed-suture Efficiency Study for Sacrocolpopexy NCT05760794	Wake Forest University Health Sciences	N/A
Recruiting	Pragmatic Evaluation of Performance and Safety of the Anchorsure® Transvaginal Device for Surgical Treatment o NCT05836844	Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes	—
Completed	Effects of the Hypopressive Exercises in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse NCT06352112	Hacettepe University	N/A
Completed	Concomitant Posterior Colporrhaphy on Bowel Functions in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair NCT06128291	National Taiwan University Hospital	—
Active Not Recruiting	Impact of Preop Video on Patient Anxiety NCT05633901	TriHealth Inc.	N/A
Completed	Posterior Mesh Fixation at the Levator Ani Level in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse NCT07194343	Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau	N/A
Unknown	What Affects Willingness to Self-manage a Pessary? NCT05750615	Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust	—
Recruiting	REDUCE Trial- Reducing Prolapse Recurrence NCT04880239	Northwestern University	N/A
Completed	STandard Versus No Opioid Prescription After Prolapse and Anti-INcontinence Surgery Trial NCT04491617	The Cleveland Clinic	N/A
Completed	Tap Block vs Conventional Pain Medication for Patients Undergoing Robotic Sacrocolpopexy NCT04440475	ProMedica Health System	N/A
Completed	Evaluation of the Safety, Performance, and Tolerability of the Sacromesh® Medical Device in the Treatment of P NCT06620211	Cousin Biotech	—
Completed	Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Co NCT03878056	Karolinska Institutet	—