Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Active Not Recruiting

Active Not RecruitingNCT07530159

Cost-Effectiveness of Retromuscular Hernia Repair

Cost-Effectiveness of Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches

Status
Active Not Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (actual)
Sponsor
Fátima Hinojosa Ramírez · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of retromuscular midline ventral hernia repair using open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Patients undergoing elective repair are included and followed to assess postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, recurrence and quality of life. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. The study is currently ongoing.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURERetromuscular ventral hernia repairRetromuscular ventral hernia repair involves dissection of the retromuscular space, closure of the hernia defect and placement of a mesh in the retromuscular position. The procedure may be performed using an open, laparoscopic or robotic approach according to surgical practice. Differences between approaches relate to access, visualization and instrumentation, while maintaining the same anatomical plane of repair.
DEVICEPolypropylene meshRetromuscular transabdominal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh of 30x30 cm
OTHERStandard perioperative careStandard perioperative care including anesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis, thromboprophylaxis, postoperative analgesia and routine postoperative management according to institutional protocols.

Timeline

Start date
2026-01-01
Primary completion
2028-01-01
Completion
2029-01-01
First posted
2026-04-15
Last updated
2026-04-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Spain

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07530159. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.