Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07509437
Simultaneous vs. Postponed Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) During Distal Radius Fracture (DRF) Fixation.
Cons and Pros of Concomitant Carpal Tunnel Release During Distal Radius Fracture Fixation
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 110 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Benha University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This randomized study evaluates the impact of performing a prophylactic carpal tunnel release (CTR) at the same time as surgical fixation for a distal radius fracture (DRF). The study compares this simultaneous approach against a postponed approach (observing and only performing CTR if symptoms develop) to determine which strategy better reduces the frequency of re-operation and improves functional outcomes.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Carpal tunnel release | During the internal fixation of the fracture via the Henry approach, the incision is extended distally into the palm. The transverse carpal ligament is incised to decompress the median nerve at the same time the bone is fixed. |
| PROCEDURE | Distal Radius Fracture Fixation with Observation. | Standard operative procedure for the fracture fixation only. Patients are monitored during follow-up; those who subsequently develop median nerve compression symptoms are then prepared for an elective CTR in a separate surgical setting. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2023-02-25
- Primary completion
- 2025-08-21
- Completion
- 2026-02-15
- First posted
- 2026-04-03
- Last updated
- 2026-04-03
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07509437. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.