NCT07498621

Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Using Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Tooth Extraction

Assessment of Maxillary Local Anesthesia Infiltration Efficiency and Adult Patient Satisfaction: Needle-free Jet vs Conventional Syringe in Simple Tooth Extraction in a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 10 (actual)
• Sponsor: King Abdulaziz University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Managing pain and anxiety during dental anesthesia remains a key concern, particularly in procedures involving needle-sensitive adult patients. Needle-free jet injection systems, such as Comfort- InTM, offer a potential alternative to conventional syringes by minimizing invasiveness and enhancing patient comfort during simple tooth extractions.

Detailed description

the study aimed to compare the efficacy, patient comfort, and pain perception between the conventional syringe injection technique and the needle-free jet injection system (Comfort-In) in dental anesthesia for simple tooth extractions.

Conditions

• Pain Perception of the New Device

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	needle-free anesthesia jet (Comfort-in™)	Dental needle-free anesthesia jet (Comfort-in™)
DEVICE	Conventional dental syringe injection	Conventional dental syringe injection

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-01-01
• Primary completion: 2025-06-30
• Completion: 2025-07-30
• First posted: 2026-03-27
• Last updated: 2026-03-27

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Saudi Arabia