Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07474896

Diaphragm-Sparing Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Shoulder Surgery

Comparison of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Versus the Combination of Suprascapular and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Diaphragmatic Function Assessment

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70 (estimated)
Sponsor
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
65 Years – 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study will compare two regional anesthesia techniques for shoulder surgery and evaluate their effects on diaphragmatic function. The standard regional anesthesia technique for shoulder surgery is the interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), which provides effective analgesia but is frequently associated with ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis due to phrenic nerve involvement. An alternative diaphragm-sparing strategy is the combination of a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB), which may reduce the risk of diaphragmatic dysfunction while maintaining effective analgesia for shoulder surgery. All participants will receive ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia prior to surgery and will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1: Interscalene brachial plexus block Group 2: Suprascapular nerve block combined with infraclavicular brachial plexus block The primary aim of this study is to determine whether the diaphragm-sparing technique reduces the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis while providing analgesia comparable to the standard interscalene block. Diaphragmatic movement will be assessed using ultrasound before and after block placement. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, pulmonary function parameters, and block-related complications.

Detailed description

The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is widely used for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery because of its reliable and effective pain control. However, ISB is commonly associated with ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis due to unintended phrenic nerve blockade, which may impair respiratory function, particularly in older patients and in those with pre-existing pulmonary disease. The combination of a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) has been proposed as a diaphragm-sparing alternative for shoulder surgery. This approach may provide adequate surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia while minimizing the risk of diaphragmatic dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial will compare the interscalene brachial plexus block with the combined suprascapular and infraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Diaphragmatic function will be evaluated using ultrasound imaging before block performance and after block placement. Additional outcomes will include postoperative pain intensity at rest and during movement, opioid consumption, pulmonary function parameters, block-related complications, length of hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for Interscalene BlockParticipants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block using 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine. The block will be performed as a single-shot injection prior to shoulder surgery. No suprascapular or infraclavicular block will be performed in this group
DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% for Infraclavicular and Suprascapular Nerve BlocksParticipants in this arm will receive two ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks as part of the diaphragm-sparing strategy: Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: 15 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine Suprascapular nerve block: 5 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine Both injections will be performed as single-shot blocks prior to surgery. No interscalene block will be performed in this arm

Timeline

Start date
2026-04-01
Primary completion
2027-01-01
Completion
2027-01-31
First posted
2026-03-16
Last updated
2026-03-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Poland

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07474896. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.