Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT07465510
Ultrasound vs. Auscultation and Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Double-Lumen Tube Placement
Ultrasonographic Confirmation of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Placement Compared With Auscultation and Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Izmir City Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
One-lung ventilation is frequently required in thoracic surgery and is most commonly achieved using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Correct positioning of the DLT is crucial for effective lung isolation and patient safety. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is considered the gold standard for confirming DLT placement; however, it may not always be immediately available and requires specific expertise. Lung ultrasonography is a rapid, noninvasive, and bedside imaging method increasingly used in anesthesiology and critical care. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in confirming the correct position of double-lumen endobronchial tubes in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The results obtained from lung ultrasound will be compared with auscultation findings and fiberoptic bronchoscopy results. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy will be considered the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of lung ultrasound and auscultation will be calculated.
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-01-25
- Primary completion
- 2026-05-25
- Completion
- 2026-06-15
- First posted
- 2026-03-12
- Last updated
- 2026-03-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07465510. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.