Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07465510

Ultrasound vs. Auscultation and Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Double-Lumen Tube Placement

Ultrasonographic Confirmation of Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Placement Compared With Auscultation and Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Thoracic Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
100 (estimated)
Sponsor
Izmir City Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

One-lung ventilation is frequently required in thoracic surgery and is most commonly achieved using double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs). Correct positioning of the DLT is crucial for effective lung isolation and patient safety. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is considered the gold standard for confirming DLT placement; however, it may not always be immediately available and requires specific expertise. Lung ultrasonography is a rapid, noninvasive, and bedside imaging method increasingly used in anesthesiology and critical care. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in confirming the correct position of double-lumen endobronchial tubes in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. The results obtained from lung ultrasound will be compared with auscultation findings and fiberoptic bronchoscopy results. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy will be considered the reference standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of lung ultrasound and auscultation will be calculated.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2026-01-25
Primary completion
2026-05-25
Completion
2026-06-15
First posted
2026-03-12
Last updated
2026-03-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07465510. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.