Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07415681
GCCC 2578 Randomized Photon vs Proton RT for Newly Diagnosed Gynecologic Primaries
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center Study Comparing Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Volume Modulated Arc Therapy in Patients Receiving Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Newly Diagnosed Gynecologic Primaries
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 116 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of study is to compare the side effects of two different forms of radiation for endometrial and cervical cancer. If you decide to enroll in this study, you will be randomized to one of two treatment groups. This study will compare two standard of care treatments: "Conventional" pHoton radiation versus pRoton radiation.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RADIATION | Volume Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) | VMAT RT- 45-50.4 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions All patients will receive concurrent cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on a weekly basis during EBRT in accordance with standard of care. No chemotherapy will be utilized during HDR brachytherapy. |
| RADIATION | Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) | IMPT- 45-50.4 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions All patients will receive concurrent cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on a weekly basis during EBRT in accordance with standard of care. No chemotherapy will be utilized during HDR brachytherapy. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2029-12-01
- Completion
- 2033-12-01
- First posted
- 2026-02-17
- Last updated
- 2026-02-17
Locations
5 sites across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07415681. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.