Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07414888

Muscle Strength Asymmetry In Sarkopenic And Non-sarcopenic Older Adults

Comparison of Dominant and Non-Dominant Side Muscle Strength Asymmetry in Sarcopenic and Non-Sarcopenic Older Adults

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
140 (estimated)
Sponsor
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The purpose of this observational study is to examine whether differences in muscle strength between the dominant and non-dominant sides of the body are associated with sarcopenia in older adults. The study will include adults aged 65 years and older with and without sarcopenia. Muscle strength will be measured on both sides of the body using handgrip strength as well as strength measurements of the biceps (upper arm muscle) and quadriceps (thigh muscle). The difference in strength between the dominant and non-dominant sides will be calculated and compared between participants with sarcopenia and those without sarcopenia. The main question it aims to answers are: * Do older adults with sarcopenia have larger differences in muscle strength between the two sides of the body compared with those without sarcopenia? * Can differences in arm and leg muscle strength help identify older adults who may be at higher risk of sarcopenia?

Detailed description

Sarcopenia is a clinical condition in elderly individuals where muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical performance decrease, negatively impacting their quality of life. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) has developed a simple clinical definition and diagnostic criteria for age-related sarcopenia. Measurements of walking speed, grip strength, and muscle mass are taken to detect sarcopenia. The severity of the disease is It is measured by physical performance. Unilateral measurements in hand grip strength measurement used in diagnosis may lead to the neglect of muscle symmetry. Hand grip strength asymmetry (difference between dominant and non-dominant hands) has recently been evaluated as a sarcopenia risk indicator.A significant association has been demonstrated between handgrip strength asymmetry (\>10% difference between limbs) and sarcopenia. Individuals with asymmetry were found to have a 2.67-fold higher risk of sarcopenia, indicating that this approach also has diagnostic utility. In addition, it has been shown that the dominant side has greater strength and muscle mass in the upper extremities; however, this difference decreases with age. A significant relationship has been identified between handgrip strength asymmetry and muscle mass, with asymmetric individuals being more likely to have low muscle mass.. In the lower extremities, quadriceps strength was found to have a clearer relationship with health outcomes. In the ISCOPE study, although the relationship between quadriceps strength and handgrip strength was limited, the combination of the two was found to be appropriate in defining the fragile group. In light of these studies, it can be suggested that dominant-non-dominant muscle strength asymmetry (upper and lower extremities) is greater in sarcopenic individuals and that this asymmetry parameter may have a guiding value in diagnosis. In the current literature, there is no study that evaluates asymmetries between biceps, quadriceps, and handgrip strength together and compares their predictive power specific to sarcopenia. This study aims to compare the differences in dominant-non-dominant biceps, quadriceps, and handgrip strength in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic elderly individuals, and to examine its potential value as a novel biomarker in the diagnosis of sarcopenia.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2026-02-12
Primary completion
2026-03-01
Completion
2026-03-12
First posted
2026-02-17
Last updated
2026-03-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07414888. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.