Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT07404488

Comparison of Two Miniscrew Bone-borne Expanders (2 vs 4 Screws) Versus Conventional Hyrax Expander in Adolescents

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dentoalveolar, Skeletal, Periodontal and Nasal/Airway Effects of a Two-miniscrew Bone-borne Expander, a Four-miniscrew Bone-borne Expander, and a Conventional Tooth-borne Hyrax Expander in Adolescents.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Roma La Sapienza · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
10 Years – 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is used to correct transverse deficiencies of the maxilla. This randomized controlled trial compares three RME devices in adolescents (age 10-15) with at least 8 mm maxillary transverse deficiency: (1) bone-borne expander supported by two palatal miniscrews, (2) bone-borne expander supported by four palatal miniscrews, and (3) conventional tooth-borne Hyrax expander. Devices were placed using static computer-guided miniscrew insertion (where applicable). All participants received the same activation protocol to reach 8 mm expansion. Cone-beam CT scans were obtained pre-treatment (T0) and at 6 months post-treatment (T1). The trial assesses skeletal, dentoalveolar, periodontal, and nasal/airway outcomes. Enrollment: 36 subjects. Study sites: Sapienza University of Rome.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial performed at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome (Nov 2021 - Sep 2024). Inclusion criteria included age under 16 years, late mixed or permanent dentition, and maxillary transverse deficiency ≥ 8 mm. Exclusion: poor oral hygiene; previous orthodontic treatment; craniofacial syndromes; cleft lip/palate; genetic/congenital diseases. After consent, eligible participants (N=36) were randomized (1:1:1) to: Group A - two-miniscrew bone-borne expander (paramedian screws near 1st-2nd premolar region); Group B - four-miniscrew bone-borne expander (two paramedian + two parapalatine); Group C - Hyrax tooth-borne expander banded to upper first molars. Miniscrews (Benefit system; PSM Medical Solutions) were placed using a CAD-CAM surgical guide planned from CBCT and digital models (Easy Driver). Activation: Hyrax click 10 mm screw; four quarter-turns at insertion then three quarter-turns/day for 12 days (0.20 mm/turn; \~0.6 mm/day) until 8 mm achieved. CBCT scan acquisition: Scanora 3Dx (Soredex). Measurements performed on Simplant v17 on defined landmarks (MaxBas, MaxAlv, MaxAlvPre, Ns, ZigMax, IntermCo, IntermoAp, molar angles, periodontal bone thickness measures, nasopalatine foramen width). Primary outcome: change in maxillary basal width (MaxBas) T0 to T1 measured on CBCT.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEMiniscrew supported expander applicationTwo palatal miniscrews with custom bone-borne expansion framework (device transmits forces to palatal bone; no tooth bands).
DEVICE4 miniscrews supported rapid maxillary expansion applicationFour palatal miniscrews with custom bone-borne expansion appliances.
DEVICEConventional tooth-borne Hyrax expander (comparator)Hyrax-type tooth-borne expander with bands cemented on upper first molars (Hyrax click 10 mm).

Timeline

Start date
2021-11-01
Primary completion
2024-09-01
Completion
2024-09-01
First posted
2026-02-11
Last updated
2026-02-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Italy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07404488. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparison of Two Miniscrew Bone-borne Expanders (2 vs 4 Screws) Versus Conventional Hyrax Expander in Adolescents (NCT07404488) · Clinical Trials Directory