Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07388368
Comparative Evaluation of Post Obturation Pain After Root Canal Treatment Using Tricalcium Silicate vs Resin-Based Sealers
A Comparative Evaluation of Post Obturation Pain After Root Canal Treatment Using Tricalcium Silicate Versus Resin-based Sealers in Cases With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 118 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the mean and standard deviation of postobturation pain using two different sealers: a tricalcium silicate-based sealer (CeraSeal) and a resin-based sealer (Endoplus) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment.
Detailed description
• The study will be conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Committee of the Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry. Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients, and demographic details (name, age, gender, and contact information) will be collected. This is a randomized clinical trial, and the sample size will be divided into two groups using computer-generated randomization. Group 1 will receive Endoplus (resin-based sealer), and Group 2 will receive CeraSeal (bioceramic sealer). All root canal procedures will be performed by the principal investigator. At the first visit, local anesthesia (2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and rubber dam isolation will be used. Working length will be determined using an apex locator and confirmed with a periapical radiograph. Chemo-mechanical preparation will be performed using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Cleaning and shaping will be done up to F2 ProTaper using hand files and nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files, with recapitulation between each file to maintain canal patency. Non-setting calcium hydroxide will be placed as an intracanal medicament, followed by a temporary restoration with Cavit. Patients will be recalled after one week for obturation and will proceed only if asymptomatic. At the second visit, obturation will be carried out according to group allocation. Group 1 will receive Endoplus resin-based sealer using a single-cone gutta-percha technique with a heated plugger (System B). Group 2 will receive CeraSeal bioceramic sealer with matched bioceramic cones using the same System B technique. Accessory cones will be used for wide or irregular canals. A permanent composite restoration (Coltene) will be placed, and occlusion will be adjusted. Postoperative pain will be recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. Ibuprofen will be prescribed only if the pain becomes unbearable, and patients will document the dose and frequency taken. Two independent blinded endodontists will evaluate radiographs for technical errors or sealer extrusion. The primary measure of success will be the level of postoperative pain at follow-up, comparing outcomes between Endoplus resin-based sealer and CeraSeal bioceramic sealer.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Tricalcium silicate sealar | Ceraseal (bioceramic sealer) - assigned to Group 2 |
| DRUG | Resin based sealer | Endoplus (resin-based sealer) - assigned to Group 1 |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-08-01
- Completion
- 2027-08-01
- First posted
- 2026-02-05
- Last updated
- 2026-02-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Pakistan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07388368. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.