Trials / Active Not Recruiting
Active Not RecruitingNCT07388329
The Effect of Post-Scenario Debriefing and Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in Anaphylactic Shock Training on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Performance, Self-Confidence, and Satisfaction
- Status
- Active Not Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Baskent University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study aims to examine the effect of rapid cycle deliberate practice (RCDP) on nursing students' knowledge, performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction levels regarding anaphylactic shock management. Based on a randomized controlled study design, the study will compare third-year nursing students in terms of RCDP application with traditional analysis methods performed at the end of a scenario. Students, divided into intervention and control groups, will have their knowledge levels, simulation performance, self-confidence, and satisfaction assessed using various scales. The retention of learning and students' subjective learning experiences will also be included in the research. The outcome of this study will determine whether RCDP is an effective method for improving critical clinical decision-making and emergency management skills in nursing students.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BEHAVIORAL | rapid cycle deliberate practice | Unlike traditional debriefing, feedback is provided by pausing the scenario within the simulation. Then the part of the script up to the pause point is repeated. |
| BEHAVIORAL | Post-scenario debriefing | Debriefing is performed at the end of the simulation scenario. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-01-15
- Primary completion
- 2026-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-07-15
- First posted
- 2026-02-05
- Last updated
- 2026-02-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07388329. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.