Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT07372170
Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of DOACS for Secondary Thrombosis Prevention in Low-risk Thrombotic APS Patients
Real-world Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Vitamin K Antagonists for Secondary Thrombosis Prevention in Low-risk Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 600 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Infanta Leonor University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is an observational study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the secondary prevention of thrombosis in patients with low-risk thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disorder associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. Although VKAs have traditionally been the standard treatment, DOACs are increasingly used in clinical practice in selected patients, despite limited evidence in this setting. This study includes patients with previous venous thrombosis and a low-risk serological profile who are treated with either DOACs or VKAs according to routine clinical practice. The primary objective is to compare thrombotic recurrence and bleeding events between both treatment strategies. The results of this study will contribute to improving knowledge about the use of DOACs in patients with low-risk thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.
Detailed description
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the occurrence of arterial, venous, or small-vessel thrombosis in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Patients with thrombotic APS have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis and require long-term anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have traditionally been the treatment of choice in this population. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have demonstrated efficacy and safety in other clinical settings, such as venous thromboembolism and non-valvular atrial fibrillation. However, their use in APS remains controversial following randomized clinical trials that showed an increased risk of arterial thrombotic events, particularly in patients with high-risk serological profiles. Current clinical guidelines suggest that DOACs may be considered in selected patients with low-risk thrombotic APS, defined by venous thrombosis and the absence of triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity. Nevertheless, evidence supporting their use in this specific subgroup is limited. This observational, analytical, ambispective (retrospective and prospective) study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs in patients with low-risk thrombotic APS under routine clinical practice conditions. Adult patients with a diagnosis of low-risk thrombotic APS who are receiving treatment with DOACs or VKAs at the time of inclusion will be eligible. Anticoagulant therapy will be prescribed at the discretion of the treating physician, with no intervention by the study protocol. The primary objective is to assess a combined effectiveness and safety endpoint, including thrombotic recurrence and major or clinically relevant bleeding. Secondary objectives include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and treatment-related quality of life assessed using the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS). The study will be conducted in Internal Medicine units across Spain and is expected to provide relevant real-world evidence to support clinical decision-making in the anticoagulant management of patients with low-risk thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.
Conditions
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2028-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-12-31
- First posted
- 2026-01-28
- Last updated
- 2026-01-30
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07372170. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.