Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07366996

Three-Dimensional Correction Methods for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescent

Three-Dimensional Correction Methods for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescent: Comparative Study

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (estimated)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
13 Years – 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of "Schroth method" and "Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis" for correcting idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.

Detailed description

The Schroth Method has gained prominence in the treatment of scoliosis due to its individualized approach, focusing on three-dimensional corrections through specific exercises tailored to each patient's spinal curvature. This method emphasizes rotational breathing and postural awareness, aiming to improve posture, reduce pain, and halt curve progression. Studies have shown that the Schroth Method can effectively improve spinal alignment, reduce curve severity, and enhance overall quality of life in patients with scoliosis. As a non-surgical intervention, it offers a valuable option for patients seeking to manage scoliosis conservatively. In contrast, the Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS) is another evidence-based method designed to treat scoliosis. SEAS focus on active self-correction, proprioceptive training, and functional exercises to stabilize and support the spine during daily activities. This approach is grounded in the principles of biomechanics and motor control, with an emphasis on developing the patient's ability to maintain correct posture independently. SEAS has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of scoliosis progression and in some cases, it may reduce the need for bracing or surgery. Comparing the Schroth Method and Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis reveals significant insights into their respective benefits and limitations. While both approaches aim to address scoliosis through non-invasive means, they differ in their specific techniques and theoretical foundations. The Schroth Method's emphasis on breathing and postural correction contrasts with SEAS's focus on active self-correction and functional integration. Understanding these differences is crucial for clinicians to tailor treatment plans according to individual patient needs and preferences. This comparative study aims to provide deeper insights into the efficacy of these two approaches, potentially guiding more effective treatment strategies for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERSchroth treatmentThe exercise program targets three-dimensional spinal correction and includes Schroth breathing for rib cage expansion, pelvic tilts for pelvic alignment, side-shift exercises for lateral correction, rotational angular breathing for derotation, seated rotational stretches for lumbar flexibility, trunk elongation with resistance for postural strength, hanging stretches for spinal decompression, and arm-leg lifts to enhance core stability and coordination.
OTHERScientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis (SEAS)The SEAS exercise program emphasizes active self-correction, core stability, and postural control during functional movements. Key exercises include pelvic tilts, seated forward bends, standing side bends, supine marching, bird-dog, heel slides, chest openers, and supine knee-to-chest stretches, all performed with self-correction to maintain neutral spinal alignment, improve muscular control, flexibility, and long-term postural stability.

Timeline

Start date
2026-02-01
Primary completion
2026-05-01
Completion
2026-05-15
First posted
2026-01-26
Last updated
2026-01-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07366996. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.