Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07322471

Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Management of Staghorn Stones

Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Management of Staghorn Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138 (estimated)
Sponsor
Menoufia University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the treatment of choice for management of large renal calculi larger than 2 cm based on the yearly updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. However, PCNL is a challenging procedure which may be associated with several complications ranging from mild complications, such as urinary extravasation, leakage, infection and bleeding requiring transfusion to sever complications, such as sepsis, injury to surrounding organs, persistent hematuria and renal function impairment. The overall complication rate varies based on patient factors and surgical expertise. Not only serious complications that defer some endourologists from performing PCNL but also such procedure is contraindicated and avoided by surgeons in cases of retrorenal colon, morbidly obese patients, spinal abnormalities and bleeding diathesis. Therefore, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) or flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for patients seeking a minimally invasive approach with a lower risk of complications. The best practice in dealing with renal stones using FURS can be achieved via preoperative stenting for 2-4 weeks, negative urine culture, ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage and optimizing laser settings. Compared to PCNL, FURS is a less challenging procedure with low learning curve, less invasive and less bleeding. However, the high cost, including laser usage cost, presenting costs and multisession costs, in addition to the high risk of postoperative infection are considered as major drawbacks of FURS. RIRS is emerging as an effective, safe, minimally invasive alternative to PCNL. Yet, the success of RIRS in comparison to PCNL, especially in a single session, is still questionable and there is no consensus about it.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREPercutaneous nephrolithotomyThis intervention includes percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lithotripsy of staghorn stone
PROCEDUREFlexible ureteroscopyThis intervention includes Flexible ureteroscopy for lithotripsy of staghorn stone

Timeline

Start date
2026-01-01
Primary completion
2026-06-01
Completion
2026-07-01
First posted
2026-01-07
Last updated
2026-01-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07322471. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.