Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT07321145
A Retrospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Versus Endoscopic Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Robotic surgical systems provide notable advantages including enhanced dexterity, a magnified three-dimensional high-definition view, and high-resolution imaging, thereby improving operative stability and precision. These features make robotic systems particularly suitable for procedures performed within confined operative spaces. As the breast is a solid organ without a natural cavity, robotic systems demonstrate strong adaptability for breast surgery. Robot-assisted breast-conserving surgery (RABCS) is one of the currently utilized robotic techniques in clinical breast cancer surgery. However, as robotic breast surgery remains in its early stage of development, evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of RABCS remains limited in the literature. Therefore, this study compares the surgical outcomes of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and robot-assisted breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients, aiming to assess and elucidate the clinical value of RABCS.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Robotic breast-conserving surgery | To perform breast-conserving surgery using a robotic system, thereby validating the safety and feasibility of robotic breast-conserving surgery. |
| PROCEDURE | Endoscopic breast-conserving surgery | To perform breast-conserving surgery using a endoscopic system. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-06-27
- Primary completion
- 2026-05-31
- Completion
- 2026-05-31
- First posted
- 2026-01-06
- Last updated
- 2026-01-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07321145. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.