NCT07320885

Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials

Fiber-Reinforced Versus Bulk-Fill Flowable Resin Composite Dentin Replacement Materials: 4-Year Clinical Performance in Class II Cavities

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 120 (actual)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 20 Years – 40 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

the current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the flowable short fiber-reinforced (SFRC) and flowable bulk-fill resin composites (BFCs) regarding their 4-year clinical performance as dentin replacement materials in class II cavities.

Detailed description

the current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the flowable short fiber-reinforced (SFRC) and flowable bulk-fill resin composites (BFCs) regarding their 4-year clinical performance as dentin replacement materials in class II cavities. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three class II cavities; one of them was restored with flowable SFRC for dentin replacement, while in the other two cavities, dentin was replaced with two different flowable BFCs. The three dentin replacements were veneered with one particulate filler resin composite (PFC) (Essentia, GC). World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria were used for clinical assessment of the restorations at 1-week (baseline), 6, 12, 18-months, 2, 3, and 4-year intervals.

Conditions

• Caries; Dentin
• Caries Class II

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Ever x flow	Ever x flow was used as dentin replacement material
OTHER	SDR	SDR was used as dentin replacement material in class II cavities
OTHER	Tetric N-Flow Bulk fill	Tetric N-Flow Bulk fill was used as dentin replacement material in class II cavities

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-07-01
• Primary completion: 2024-08-15
• Completion: 2024-08-15
• First posted: 2026-01-06
• Last updated: 2026-01-06

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt