Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07308990

Limited Versus Extended Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

To Develop and Implement a Method for Optimizing the Volume of Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Surgical Treatment of Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800 (estimated)
Sponsor
N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre · Other Government
Sex
Male
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a randomized controlled study assessing outcome of low (no or limited) versus high (limited or extended) extent of lymph node dissection in addition to radical prostatectomy in patients with operable localized or locally advanced prostate cancer.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURERadical prostatectomy with extended / limited lymph node dissectionIn patients with NCCN high or unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer - radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection (incl. external iliac, obturator, internal iliac and common iliac nodes up to ureter bilaterally). In patients with NCCN low or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer - radical prostatectomy with limited lymph node dissection (incl. obturator + / - external iliac lymph nodes bilaterally).
PROCEDURERadical prostatectomy with limited / no lymph node dissectionIn patients with NCCN high or unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer - radical prostatectomy with limited lymph node dissection (incl. obturator + / - external iliac lymph nodes bilaterally). In patients with NCCN low or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer - radical prostatectomy with no lymph nodes dissection bilaterally.

Timeline

Start date
2025-10-29
Primary completion
2030-05-30
Completion
2032-05-30
First posted
2025-12-30
Last updated
2025-12-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Belarus

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07308990. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.