NCT07300878

Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics

Comparison Of Hemodynamic Stress Response To Laryngoscopy With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Macintosh Laryngoscopy In Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 208 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 16 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.

Detailed description

In this study Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with group V patients being intubated using Videolaryngoscope while group M patients will be intubated using Macintosh laryngoscope. The amount of rise in blood pressure and heart rate as a result of laryngoscopy will be noted.

Conditions

• Laryngoscopic Stress Response
• Video Laryngoscopy
• Conventional Laryngoscopy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy	Patient will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope
DEVICE	Conventional macintosh laryngoscopy	Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-12-22
• Primary completion: 2026-06-22
• Completion: 2026-06-22
• First posted: 2025-12-24
• Last updated: 2025-12-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Regulatory

• FDA-regulated device study