Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT07279389

Comparative Study Between One-Shot Dilatation Versus Serial Dilatation Techniques for Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Adult Patients

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This comparative study aims to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, outcome, feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications of one-shot dilatation versus serial dilatation techniques for access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stone disease in adult patients.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURErenal dilatation by one-shot dilatation techniquerenal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.
PROCEDURErenal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).insertion of the Alken guide followed by a telescopic dilator between 9Fr to 30Fr, then an Amplatz sheath 30Fr was advanced over the dilator which was then removed, leaving the Amplatz sheath in the collecting system
PROCEDURErenal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz)sequential renal dilatation with Amplatz dilator set was used

Timeline

Start date
2022-02-27
Primary completion
2022-08-27
Completion
2023-08-05
First posted
2025-12-12
Last updated
2025-12-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07279389. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.