Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07279389
Comparative Study Between One-Shot Dilatation Versus Serial Dilatation Techniques for Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Adult Patients
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This comparative study aims to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, outcome, feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications of one-shot dilatation versus serial dilatation techniques for access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stone disease in adult patients.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique | renal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod. |
| PROCEDURE | renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken). | insertion of the Alken guide followed by a telescopic dilator between 9Fr to 30Fr, then an Amplatz sheath 30Fr was advanced over the dilator which was then removed, leaving the Amplatz sheath in the collecting system |
| PROCEDURE | renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz) | sequential renal dilatation with Amplatz dilator set was used |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2022-02-27
- Primary completion
- 2022-08-27
- Completion
- 2023-08-05
- First posted
- 2025-12-12
- Last updated
- 2025-12-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07279389. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.