Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07274605

Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Extended Isthmusectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Isthmus Tumors of the Thyroid

Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Extended Isthmusectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Isthmus Tumors of the Thyroid: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
520 (estimated)
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Prospective randomized open phase III non-inferiority trial in cT1bN0N1aM0 isthmus tumors of the thyroid comparing: extended Isthmusectomy (Isthmusectomy + Central Neck Dissection)(experimental group) versus total thyroidectomy + Central Neck Dissection (reference group).

Detailed description

The thyroid isthmus is a narrow structure connecting the two lobes of the thyroid. Papillary carcinoma arising from this site accounts for only 1-9% of all thyroid cancers. However, due to its unique anatomical location, it is more prone to extranodal extension and bilateral lymph node metastasis, exhibiting more aggressive biological behavior. The optimal extent of surgery remains controversial: total thyroidectomy facilitates postoperative radioactive iodine therapy and monitoring but results in permanent dependence on thyroid hormone replacement and increases the risk of complications such as hypocalcemia, adversely affecting patients' quality of life. In contrast, conservative approaches like extended isthmusectomy can preserve partial thyroid function, reduce complications, and maintain a better quality of life, making them particularly suitable for low-risk patients with small tumors and no metastasis. Existing retrospective studies indicate no significant difference in recurrence rates between the two surgical approaches, though the evidence remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel-controlled, randomized trial to directly compare total thyroidectomy and extended isthmusectomy in terms of postoperative recurrence rates, quality of life, and complications, thereby providing high-quality evidence for surgical decision-making.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURETotal thyroidectomyTotal Thyroidectomy with bilateral central compartment (level VI) neck dissection - surgical removal of entire thyroid gland and perform bilateral Level VI neck dissection. This is the standard treatment recommended by the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (2nd Edition). The participating surgeons all routinely perform complete central neck dissections. They were selected for this study due to their standardized technique, which ensures a consistent surgical approach.
PROCEDUREExtended isthmusectomyExtended isthmusectomy with bilateral central compartment (level VI) neck dissection : Completely resect the isthmus and portions of the bilateral thyroid gland adjacent to the isthmus, ensuring an R0 resection margin for the tumor, while preserving at least more than half of the bilateral thyroid lobes.

Timeline

Start date
2025-12-19
Primary completion
2028-11-01
Completion
2032-12-01
First posted
2025-12-10
Last updated
2025-12-10

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07274605. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Extended Isthmusectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy for Isthmus Tumors of the Thyroi (NCT07274605) · Clinical Trials Directory