Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07270354

STUMBL vs TTSS in Predicting Morbidity and Mortality of Blunt Chest Trauma

STUMBL (Study of the Management of Blunt Chest Wall Trauma) vs TTSS (Thoracic Trauma Severity Score) in Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality Rate of Blunt Chest Trauma

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
124 (estimated)
Sponsor
Assiut University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aim to compare the effectiveness of the STUMBL Score and the Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS) in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma, and to evaluate which scoring system provides greater clinical utility for early risk stratification and management decisions.

Detailed description

Blunt chest wall trauma poses a clinical challenge due to its substantial contribution to morbidity and mortality, particularly following falls and vehicular accidents. Early identification of patients at high risk of complications is critical yet difficult, as delayed respiratory issues often escape initial detection. Traditional trauma scoring systems (e.g. ISS, AIS) lack specificity for isolated thoracic injury, creating a niche for more focused prognostic tools. Two promising models have emerged: the STUMBL Score-based on age, number of rib fractures, chronic lung disease, pre-injury anticoagulant use, and oxygen saturation-is explicitly designed for blunt chest trauma prognosis. Studies report strong discriminatory performance, with development-phase c-index up to 0.96 . External validations vary: one UK cohort showed STUMBL ≥ 11 had a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 78%, and AUC of 0.84-comparable to clinician judgment ; Italian data demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index \~0.90) and calibration . The Thoracic Trauma Severity Score (TTSS), initially validated in polytrauma ICU patients, yields moderate to good discrimination (c-indices 0.72-0.85) across validation studies . Though these scores show promise, high methodological bias and limited external validations temper their widespread adoption . A direct, comparative analysis of STUMBL and TTSS within a well-defined patient cohort is thus needed.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTChest X-RayFirst-line imaging for suspected rib fractures, hemothorax, pneumothorax, or pulmonary contusion
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTComputed Tomography (CT) Chest (with or without contrast)Gold standard for detecting: Rib fractures (especially multiple and posterior). Pulmonary contusions and lacerations. Hemothorax, pneumothorax, hemopericardium. Pleural or mediastinal injuries

Timeline

Start date
2025-12-30
Primary completion
2026-12-30
Completion
2026-12-30
First posted
2025-12-08
Last updated
2025-12-08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07270354. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.