Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07265063
Pulpotomy With CEM vs Pulpectomy With Ca(OH)2/Iodoform in Primary Molars
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Pulpotomy Using Calcium-Enriched Mixture Versus Pulpectomy Using Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste for the Treatment of Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 6 Years – 8 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Will Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement pulpotomy have less postoperative pain and more clinical and radiographic success compared to Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform (Metapex) pulpectomy when managing second primary molars with irreversible pulpitis?
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Pulpotomy using Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) Cement | pulpotomy procedure using (CEM) Cement as pulp dressing material |
| PROCEDURE | Pulpectomy using Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste (Metapex) | pulpectomy procdure performed using Metapex paste as root canal filling material |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-10-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-01
- First posted
- 2025-12-04
- Last updated
- 2025-12-04
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07265063. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.