Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT07261189

Comparing Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain

Comparative Study of Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Lichenstein's Tension-free Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168 (actual)
Sponsor
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre · Other Government
Sex
Male
Age
20 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare postoperative pain between staples and polypropylene sutures used for mesh fixation in patients undergoing elective Lichtenstein tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

Detailed description

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures worldwide. The standard method for mesh fixation during Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty uses polypropylene sutures. However, skin staples have recently been introduced as a faster and potentially less painful alternative. This randomized controlled trial compares both methods in terms of postoperative pain, measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and operative time.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREStaples for mesh fixationMesh secured using stainless steel staples in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty
PROCEDUREPolypropylene suture for mesh fixationMesh secured using polypropylene sutures in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty

Timeline

Start date
2025-09-01
Primary completion
2026-02-28
Completion
2026-03-28
First posted
2025-12-03
Last updated
2026-04-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07261189. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.