Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07261189
Comparing Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain
Comparative Study of Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Lichenstein's Tension-free Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 168 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre · Other Government
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 20 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare postoperative pain between staples and polypropylene sutures used for mesh fixation in patients undergoing elective Lichtenstein tension-free inguinal hernia repair.
Detailed description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures worldwide. The standard method for mesh fixation during Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty uses polypropylene sutures. However, skin staples have recently been introduced as a faster and potentially less painful alternative. This randomized controlled trial compares both methods in terms of postoperative pain, measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and operative time.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Staples for mesh fixation | Mesh secured using stainless steel staples in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty |
| PROCEDURE | Polypropylene suture for mesh fixation | Mesh secured using polypropylene sutures in Lichenstein tension-free inguinal hernioplasty |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-02-28
- Completion
- 2026-03-28
- First posted
- 2025-12-03
- Last updated
- 2026-04-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Pakistan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07261189. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.