NCT07248046

Smartphone vs Manual Interpretation of Biomarkers for Ovulation and Luteal Phase Detection (SMOM Study)

Comparing Cervical Mucus, PDG, LH, and Basal Body Temperature Combinations for Ovulation and Luteal Phase Identification Using the Premom Smartphone App Versus User-Read Test Results: A Prospective Observational Study

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 30 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Bruyère Health Research Institute. · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 16 Years – 45 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

This study will compare different combinations of fertility signs (cervical mucus (CM), luteinizing hormone \[LH\], pregnanediol glucuronide \[PDG\], and basal body temperature \[BBT\]) to determine which are most reliable for identifying ovulation and luteal phase length. Thirty existing Premom App users will track daily observations for three menstrual cycles. Participants will record mucus, perform urine tests, upload test strip photos to the Premom App, and measure BBT. Both participant readings and AI-assisted app readings will be analyzed. The main goal is to find which marker pairings give the most accurate picture of ovulation timing and luteal phase length. Secondary goals include understanding ease of use, the number of tests required, and whether the app improves accuracy.

Detailed description

This study examines how well different combinations of fertility signs-cervical mucus changes, hormone levels in urine, and body temperature-can help identify ovulation and luteal phase length. The study uses the Premom App, which allows users to record fertility signs and take photos of urine hormone test strips for AI-assisted interpretation. Four marker pairs will be compared: Mucus plus PDG, LH plus PDG, Mucus plus BBT, and LH plus BBT. Each participant will track three cycles, with both app-based and user-based readings analyzed. The study will assess which marker pairings are most accurate and user-friendly. Secondary endpoints include usability, test burden, and app vs. participant agreement. Results may support improvements in fertility awareness and digital health tools. Risks are minimal and involve time commitment for daily tracking. \*\*This is an observational study. Participants are not assigned to any intervention; all fertility signs collected are part of their existing self-tracking using the Premom App. The study analyzes these naturally occurring data to compare marker pairings for identifying ovulation and luteal phase length.\*\*

Conditions

• Fertility
• Mobile Applications
• Artifical Intelligence
• Cervical Mucus
• Body Temperature
• Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
• Ovulation
• Menstrual Cycle
• Progesterone

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	Premom App-Assisted Fertility Tracking	Participants use the Premom smartphone application (Easy Healthcare Corporation) to log daily fertility indicators - cervical mucus (CM), urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) strips, urinary pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG) strips, and basal body temperature (BBT) - over three menstrual cycles. Both participant-read and AI-interpreted app readings are compared to identify ovulation and luteal phase length. \*\*This is an observational study. Participants are not assigned to any intervention; all fertility signs collected are part of their existing self-tracking using the Premom App. The study analyzes these naturally occurring data to compare marker pairings for identifying ovulation and luteal phase length.\*\*

Timeline

• Start date: 2026-01-15
• Primary completion: 2026-09-15
• Completion: 2026-11-15
• First posted: 2025-11-25
• Last updated: 2026-01-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada