Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07235475
Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block
Comparison Between the Analgesic Effect of Fascia Transversalis Block vs Caudal Block in Pediatrics Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgeries: Randomized Double-blinded Comparative Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 1 Year – 7 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Despite the growing interest in interfascial blocks and their successful use in pediatric surgeries, no previous randomized clinical trials have directly compared the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effect, and safety profile of the fascia transversalis block versus the caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair. This study aims to address this gap by providing the first head-to-head randomized comparison between both blocks in a standardized surgical setting
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Caudal Block Anesthesia | Patients will receive a caudal block with 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% injected. The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt) |
| PROCEDURE | Fascia Transversalis Block | Patients will receive Fascia Transversalis Block using 0.5 mL/kg of Bupivacaine 0.25% . The commercial preparation that will be used is Bupivacaine HCl (Sunny Pharmaceutical, Egypt) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-11-20
- Primary completion
- 2026-04-01
- Completion
- 2026-04-14
- First posted
- 2025-11-19
- Last updated
- 2026-04-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07235475. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.