NCT07204210

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) and Myofascial Release Techniques in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

• Status: Enrolling By Invitation
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 114 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Istanbul Rumeli University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Various treatment methods are employed for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis. However, many of these approaches involve high-cost interventions, such as extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applications. The present study aims to compare the treatment effectiveness of myofascial release-considered a cost-effective intervention-with ESWT, which is among the most commonly preferred treatment modalities.

Detailed description

The present study aims to compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), a frequently used treatment for patients with plantar fasciitis and heel pain, with specific myofascial release techniques. The paucity of studies in the literature and the lack of definitive evidence on this topic served as the basis for initiating this research. A total of 114 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis, deemed appropriate for ESWT and myofascial release therapy and meeting the inclusion criteria, are planned to participate in the study. These 114 patients will be randomly divided into three groups of 38 each. Before and after treatment, each patient will complete a demographic data form, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Roles and Maudsley pain scores, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot clinical assessment scales. Participants will be randomly selected from among individuals who applied to Kayseri City Hospital with complaints of plantar fasciitis within the Kayseri province. The three groups will consist of a myofascial release treatment group, an ESWT treatment group, and a control group. The ESWT group will receive 2,000 pulses per session at 2.0 bar intensity, 14 Hz frequency, and a dose of 0.2 mJ/mm². Specific myofascial release techniques will be administered to the myofascial release group once per week for 16 minutes, over a total period of 5 weeks. No treatment will be administered to the control group. An evaluation appointment will be scheduled 5 weeks after baseline data collection using the designated assessment tools. Pre-treatment and post-treatment data for all three groups will be recorded using the SPSS software. After data collection is completed, appropriate statistical analyses will be conducted.

Conditions

• Plantar Fasciitis

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	extracorporeal shockwave therapy	Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a treatment using powerful acoustic pulses which is mostly used to treat kidney stones and in physical therapy and orthopedics. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is used as a second line measure to treat tennis elbow, shoulder rotator cuff pain, Achilles tendinitis, plantar fasciitis, and greater trochanteric pain syndrome. The lithotripter attempts to break up the stone with minimal collateral damage by using an externally applied, focused, high-intensity acoustic pulse. The patient is usually sedated or anesthetized for the procedure in order to help them remain still and reduce possible discomfort.
OTHER	myofascial release technique	Myofascial release (MFR, self-myofascial release) is an alternative medicine therapy claimed to be useful for treating skeletal muscle immobility and pain by relaxing contracted muscles, improving blood and lymphatic circulation and stimulating the stretch reflex in muscles. Writing for Science-Based Medicine, Harriet Hall described myofascial release as an umbrella term for several types of physical manipulation, which might more simply be described as a kind of massage based on vaguely defined scientific notions. Reviews published in 2013 and 2015 evaluating evidence for MFR efficacy found that clinical trials that had been conducted varied in quality, technique, outcome measurements and had mixed outcomes; the 2015 review noted: "it is time for scientific evidences on MFR to support its clinical use.
OTHER	Placebo Control	Participants were not given any interventions that had proven effective for treatment. An appointment was made for 5 weeks later.

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-09-15
• Primary completion: 2025-10-27
• Completion: 2025-12-31
• First posted: 2025-10-02
• Last updated: 2025-10-02

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)