NCT07190820

Comparison of Accuracy of Full-arch Implant Digital and Conventional Impressions.

Comparison of the Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impression in Edentulous Arch

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 24 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 30 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether the accuracy of digital impressions is comparable to conventional impressions. It will also learn about the clinical effect of different method. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does drug ABC lower the number of times participants need to use a rescue inhaler? What medical problems do participants have when taking drug ABC? Researchers will compare digital impression to conventional impression to see if the accuracy of the digital method. Participants will: Take an impression with one of the methods Visit the clinic a total of 6 times for checkups and tests

Conditions

• Edentulous Jaw

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	digital impression	complete arch implant impression with intraoral photogrammetry
PROCEDURE	conventional impression	conventional open tray splint impression

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-09-01
• Primary completion: 2026-07-31
• Completion: 2026-12-31
• First posted: 2025-09-24
• Last updated: 2025-09-24