Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07174297
Acotiamide vs Itopride in Postprandial Distress Syndrome
To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Acotiamide Versus Itopride in Patient With Post Prandial Distress Syndrome Type of Functional Dyspepsia
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 152 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Getz Pharma · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The goal of this study is to "To compare the efficacy and safety of Acotiamide versus Itopride in patient with post prandial distress syndrome type of functional dyspepsia"
Detailed description
Investigator is aiming to conduct an Open-label, comparative randomized controlled, parallel, two-arms, multi-center study. Primary Outcomes: • Difference in overall treatment effect between both groups by using Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS) in 8 weeks from the baseline Secondary Outcomes: * Difference between both groups in symptoms of Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PDS) (including early satiety, abdominal bloating, postprandial fullness) by using Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS) * Difference between both groups in quality of life by using short form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI) from baseline * Frequency of adverse events, serious adverse events and tolerability in both groups
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Acotiamide | Both these drugs are used for the management of PDS type of FD |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-10-30
- Primary completion
- 2026-12-30
- Completion
- 2027-04-30
- First posted
- 2025-09-15
- Last updated
- 2025-09-23
Regulatory
- FDA-regulated drug study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07174297. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.