Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT07169695
A Study to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of T1695 Versus Ciclosporin in Participants With Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of T1695 Ophthalmic Suspension, Versus Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion, in Participants With Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Laboratoires Thea · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 4 Years – 17 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of the study is to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of T1695 Versus Ciclosporin in Participants with Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Slit Lamp Examination | The participant will have a slit lamp examination |
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Far Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) | The participant 's BCVA will be evaluated. |
| DRUG | T1695 | The participant should instill T1695. |
| DRUG | Ciclosporin | The participant should instill Ciclosporin. |
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Corneal fluorescein staining score on modified Oxford scale | One drop of fluorescein will be instilled to assess the fluorescein staining score on the modified Oxford scale. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2026-03-24
- Primary completion
- 2027-01-21
- Completion
- 2027-01-21
- First posted
- 2025-09-12
- Last updated
- 2026-04-15
Locations
11 sites across 1 country: India
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07169695. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.