Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07169695

A Study to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of T1695 Versus Ciclosporin in Participants With Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of T1695 Ophthalmic Suspension, Versus Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion, in Participants With Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (estimated)
Sponsor
Laboratoires Thea · Industry
Sex
All
Age
4 Years – 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of the study is to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of T1695 Versus Ciclosporin in Participants with Moderate to Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSlit Lamp ExaminationThe participant will have a slit lamp examination
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFar Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)The participant 's BCVA will be evaluated.
DRUGT1695The participant should instill T1695.
DRUGCiclosporinThe participant should instill Ciclosporin.
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCorneal fluorescein staining score on modified Oxford scaleOne drop of fluorescein will be instilled to assess the fluorescein staining score on the modified Oxford scale.

Timeline

Start date
2026-03-24
Primary completion
2027-01-21
Completion
2027-01-21
First posted
2025-09-12
Last updated
2026-04-15

Locations

11 sites across 1 country: India

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07169695. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.