Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07151651

A Comparison Between Biportal and Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparative Study Between Uniportal and Biportal Endocopic Techniques on Clinical and Surgical Outcomes

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (estimated)
Sponsor
Sohag University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to provide a detailed comparison between different methods of lumbar discectomy by the use of different types of spine endoscopy to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each type

Detailed description

The aim of this study is to compare between uniportal and biportal endoscopic techniques in patients with lumbar disc herniation in terms of efficacy, safety, and learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery .The research will focus on clinical outcomes, functional recovery, complication rates, patient satisfaction and surgical proficiency in different endoscopic spine surgery techniques, including uniportal and biportal approaches assessing their relative advantages and limitations.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREEndoscopic lumbar discectomyUniportal and boportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (transforaminal or interlaminar)

Timeline

Start date
2025-09-01
Primary completion
2026-09-01
Completion
2027-09-01
First posted
2025-09-03
Last updated
2025-09-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07151651. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.