Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07151651
A Comparison Between Biportal and Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparative Study Between Uniportal and Biportal Endocopic Techniques on Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Sohag University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aims to provide a detailed comparison between different methods of lumbar discectomy by the use of different types of spine endoscopy to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of each type
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare between uniportal and biportal endoscopic techniques in patients with lumbar disc herniation in terms of efficacy, safety, and learning curve of endoscopic spine surgery .The research will focus on clinical outcomes, functional recovery, complication rates, patient satisfaction and surgical proficiency in different endoscopic spine surgery techniques, including uniportal and biportal approaches assessing their relative advantages and limitations.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Endoscopic lumbar discectomy | Uniportal and boportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (transforaminal or interlaminar) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2026-09-01
- Completion
- 2027-09-01
- First posted
- 2025-09-03
- Last updated
- 2025-09-03
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07151651. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.