Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT07138586
Evaluation of Low Level Laser Therapy and Lidocaine Versus Chlorhexidine for the Management of Traumatic Oral Ulcers in Children
Evaluation of Low Level Laser Therapy and Lidocaine Versus Chlorhexidine for the Management of Traumatic Oral Ulcers in Children: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (actual)
- Sponsor
- National Research Centre, Egypt · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 4 Years – 12 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
the goal of the study was to evaluate the pain reduction and healing efficiency of traumatic oral ulcers in children using low-level laser therapy with diode laser 980 nm, lidocaine oral gel and chlorhexidine mouthwash
Detailed description
thirty children were randomly allocated to three groups of ten individuals each: Group one: therapy, Group two: using Lidocaine gel 4 times daily and Group three using chlorhexidine mouthwash 4 times daily . Assessment was done by evaluating pain by Visual Analogue scale; VAS (primary outcome) and assessment of ulcer size by periodontal probe (Secondary outcome) and Parental acceptance of the therapy (tertiary outcome) immediately after treatment, at day two, five, seven, then at two weeks
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RADIATION | low level laser therapy group | patients received low level laser therapy using diode laser 980 nm with a low power |
| DRUG | Lidocaine gel group | patients was instructed to use Lidocaine gel (Oracure gel) 4 times daily. |
| DRUG | Chlorhexidine mouthwash group (positive control group). | patients was instructed to use Chlorhexidine mouthwash (Orovex) 4 times daily (control group). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-01-24
- Primary completion
- 2025-04-20
- Completion
- 2025-06-01
- First posted
- 2025-08-24
- Last updated
- 2025-09-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07138586. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.