Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Suspended

SuspendedNCT07104305

Nudging and Relationship Building With Frequent Contact

Status
Suspended
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study aims to test in what way a care strategy incorporating frequent contact can benefit patients with musculoskeletal condition that necessitates some adaptation and resiliency to symptoms and limitations that are expected to be either long-lasting or permanent. Patients will be randomized into either group A, where they will receive the standard amount of contact with their clinician, or group B, in which they will have contact with their clinican more frequently. The communication strategy may utilize text, email, portal, phone, video or other options as agreed on. The frequency will be at least once a week. All patients will complete a set of questionnaires at the end of the visit.

Detailed description

Irregular and uncomfortable bodily symptoms are common. Most are well adapted in a healthy life. People seek care when a symptom becomes a concern. Even the effort to attend a routine healthy check-up is usually based on not wanting to miss anything, which is accompanied by at least a slight concern that a problem might be found. People that are seeking care are unsettled to some degree. This unsettled feeling is often rooted in or worsened by unhelpful thoughts (less effective cognitive coping strategies). An example of a less effective cognitive coping strategy is rumination on worst-case thoughts (catastrophic thinking). The unsettled feeling is worse when thoughts are perceived as facts (cognitive fusion). Cognitive fusion is greater when people are under greater stress or distress. Clinicians can help people feel better and do more by gently correcting these misconceptions. And when correction of misconceptions is to some degree at odds with a person's experience of reality, expert advice may seem impersonal, dismissive, and uncaring. Adherence to medical expertise is enhanced by a trusting relationship with one's clinicians. There are several methods for nurturing a clinician-patient relationship. One is to make small agreements or compromises such as ordering a test that is not likely to yield useful information, has a small risk of harm, and uses resources and doing so in the context of efforts to move towards more effective cognitive coping strategies and greater self-efficacy. Another is to use educational tools such as decision aids to depersonalize the transfer of expertise. A third approach is use more frequent contact to deepen the relationship. This study posits that establishing a frequent-contact plan with a patient that might benefit from a healthier inner narrative can improve health using few resources other than clinician time, with a good patient experience compared to the typical single or infrequent in person specialist office visits.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
BEHAVIORALHigh-contact communication strategyPatients will have contact with their clinician more frequently. The communication strategy may utilize text, email, portal, phone, video or other options as agreed on. The frequency will be at least once a week. All patients will complete a set of questionnaires at the end of the visit.

Timeline

Start date
2026-01-01
Primary completion
2026-07-01
Completion
2026-12-01
First posted
2025-08-05
Last updated
2025-08-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07104305. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.