Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07097623

Optimal Acute Adult Psychiatric In-patient Care in Hong Kong

Optimal Acute Adult Psychiatric In-patient Care in Hong Kong: a Mixed-method Study

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
160 (estimated)
Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 64 Years
Healthy volunteers

Summary

This mixed-method study aims to evaluate the optimal number of hospital beds and quality of acute adult psychiatric inpatient care in Hong Kong using online Delphi surveys for psychiatric nurses and individual interviews for service users with mental health conditions and family caregivers. The main question it aims to answer is: What are the consensus points for quality acute adult psychiatric inpatient care in Hong Kong from psychiatric nurses, service users, and caregivers? Psychiatric nurses will respond to three rounds of online Delphi surveys, while service users and caregivers will attend individual semi-structured interviews.

Detailed description

The deinstitutionalisation movement has been implemented since the 1950s, particularly in the UK and the US. Evidence of psychiatric community care has been well-documented, showing improvements in quality of life, increased autonomy, a reduction in psychiatric readmissions, and a shorter length of hospitalisation. However, this movement has not been universally adopted, and a few drawbacks have emerged in the past decade. Increased social risk aversion, such as homicides and a higher incidence of comorbidity of severe mental illnesses and substance abuse, has led to a growing demand for psychiatric inpatient services. Additionally, insufficient long-term community residential care was associated with untreated service users living in prisons or experiencing homelessness. The reduction in psychiatric beds was also associated with an increased prison population in the UK, Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South America. From 2000 to 2014, 55% of 161 nations had stable or increasing levels of institutionalisation (\> 1% annually). Several national characteristics, for example, population density and the percentage of the population living in urban areas, were negatively associated with deinstitutionalisation. The findings argued that the development of deinstitutionalisation should carefully consider the maturity of local psychiatric facilities and systems; otherwise, achieving a balance of optimal psychiatric inpatient care and deinstitutionalisation may be difficult. This imbalance can lead to a shift of service users into the criminal justice system. Moreover, deinstitutionalisation was positively associated with acute admission rates and bed occupancy. A viewpoint published in JAMA discussed the dilemma of psychiatric inpatient care versus community psychiatric development in the US, calling for integrated, patient-centred long-term psychiatric hospital and outpatient care for individuals with chronic, serious mental health conditions. Since 2010, the Hong Kong government has made extensive efforts and committed significant resources to community psychiatric care, including the extended hospital community psychiatric services (CPS) and district-based community mental health centres. However, these initiatives led to a reduction in emergency psychiatric admissions, which is one of the key quality indicators of community mental health care, for neuroses, but not for other diagnoses of mental health conditions, particularly for severe mental illnesses. A balanced mental health system that integrates psychiatric inpatient and CPS care, especially for severe mental illnesses with notable risks of violence and suicide, should be actively reconsidered. As psychiatric inpatient service capacity decreases during active deinstitutionalisation, optimal psychiatric inpatient care has often been overlooked, which may hinder the development of specialised inpatient services and pose risks to clinical quality and safety due to overcrowded ward environments and increased admission turnover rates, commonly known as the 'revolving door' effect.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERrespond to 3 rounds of online Delphi surveysIn the first round, the responses of the participants will be collected, coded, and categorised into several themes/factors anonymously. In the second round, the participants will obtain the controlled feedback of all other participants and rate the level of agreement of the factors using a 5-point Likert scale ('strongly agree', 'agree', 'neither agree or disagree', 'disagree', and 'strongly disagree'; or 'essential', 'important', 'don't know/depends', 'unimportant', and 'should not be considered'). In the third round, the participants will rank the importance of the factors. In each round, the participants will be expected to complete the survey within one month.
OTHERattend an individual semi-structured interviewThe individual semi-structured interview will be audio-recorded, last for 45 minutes at maximum, and carried out by a trained and independent research assistant in a meeting room of PolyU or a room affiliated with the respective acute wards of the participating hospitals.

Timeline

Start date
2025-08-04
Primary completion
2026-08-31
Completion
2026-08-31
First posted
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-07-31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07097623. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.