Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07093788

Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions

Super High-pressure Balloon Versus Intravascular Lithotripsy to Prepare Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: a Randomized Controlled Trial (Shape)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78 (estimated)
Sponsor
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

this trial aimed to evaluate the stent expansion through intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography (OCT) \& intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)) among individuals underwent different preparation techniques ,then comparing the efficacy and safety of super high-pressure balloon to IVL in severely calcified lesions

Detailed description

Calcified lesions posed a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The existence of calcified plaque increased the difficulty of optimal stent expansion and the risk of target lesion failure(TLF). Consequently, optimizing the preparation techniques for calcified lesions before stent implantation has assumed growing importance. As a kind of novel double-layered balloon, super high-pressure balloon can expand uniformly under extreme pressure. Previous studies have demonstrated that super high-pressure balloon perform non-inferiorly or superiorly to other strategies in terms of final stent expansion. Through triggering localized pulsatile sonic pressure, intravascular lithotripsy(IVL) cracked intimal and medial calcium plaque within the artery. In present series of studies(DISRUPT), the optimized preparation of calcified lesions with IVL has been proved to be safe and effective. According to guidelines and clinical practice, IVL is applicable to different types of severe calcification lesions, including concentric and eccentric calcifications. However, considering its technological and economic costs, finding other preparation techniques non-inferiority to IVL was essential. In clinical practice, super high-pressure balloon had shown considerable effects of preparation for calcified lesions. However, study focused on the comparison of super high-pressure balloon with IVL for severe calcified lesions was limited. In summary, this randomized trial aimed to evaluate the stent expansion through intravascular imaging among individuals underwent different preparation techniques ,then comparing the efficacy and safety of super high-pressure balloon to IVL in severely calcified lesions

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEsuper high-pressure balloonpreparation strategy for calcified lesions after unsatisfactory dilation
DEVICEintravascular lithotripsy (IVL)preparation strategy for calcified lesions after unsatisfactory dilation

Timeline

Start date
2025-09-01
Primary completion
2026-12-30
Completion
2027-06-30
First posted
2025-07-30
Last updated
2026-03-10

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07093788. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.