Trials / Enrolling By Invitation
Enrolling By InvitationNCT07077915
Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement
Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Study
- Status
- Enrolling By Invitation
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 24 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Mohamad Ali Itani · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 25 Years – 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique
Detailed description
A bifurcation inter-radicular bone of 2 mm or more in a none restorable lower molar will be needed in order to successfully be able to drill the bone with conventional or Osseo densification burs, followed by placing the implant at this site. A xenograft bone material will be used to fill the extraction socket and a customized temporary abutment using flowable composite and a silicone mold will be fabricated and placed over it after polishing it.
Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implant Placement
- Conventional Drilling Technique
- Osseodensification Drilling Technique
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Osseodensification burs | Densah burs are osseodensification burs used to condense bone and prepare dental implant site, unlike conventional technique which cuts and removes the bone |
| OTHER | Conventional burs | Preparation of dental implant site by the Conventional technique using Conventional burs that are subtractive |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2025-12-23
- Completion
- 2025-12-23
- First posted
- 2025-07-22
- Last updated
- 2025-07-28
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Lebanon
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07077915. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.