Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07076212

Evaluating NALIRIFOX vs Modified Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Phase II Study Evaluating NALIRIFOX Versus Modified Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52 (estimated)
Sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a single-center, open-label, randomized Phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of NALIRIFOX (Arm 1) vs mGAP (Arm 2) in previously untreated patients with locally advanced (unresectable) and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Detailed description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies in the United States and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In the metastatic setting, treatment consists of systemic chemotherapy in hopes of palliating symptoms and prolonging survival. However, prognosis remains very poor, and patients will invariably succumb to disease-related complications. Therefore, there is a critical need to identify new first-line systemic therapeutic options in hopes of improving clinical outcomes in PDAC. FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-flurouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) became a standard of care systemic therapy option in metastatic PDAC, largely based on the findings from the Phase III ACCORD 11 study, where the objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX vs single-agent gemcitabine (32% vs 9%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.4 months vs 3.3 months) and overall survival (OS) (11.1 months vs 6.8 months) were higher as well. However, a recent Phase I/II study demonstrated tolerability of the chemotherapy combination liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (NALIRIFOX) in locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. This has been followed by a randomized Phase III study evaluating first-line NALIRIFOX vs gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, which has demonstrated greater ORR with NALIRIFOX than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (41.8% vs 36.2%). Both median PFS (7.4 months vs 5.6 months) and OS (11.1 months vs 9.2 months) were significantly higher with NALIRIFOX than with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as well. In light of these findings, NALIRIFOX use in treatment-naïve patients is increasing. As suggested above, gemcitabine combinations have elicited treatment responses in advanced PDAC as well. Efficacy of first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was demonstrated in the MPACT trial, where a higher ORR and median OS was noted in the combination arm vs single-agent gemcitabine (23% vs 7% and 8.7 months vs 6.7 months, respectively). This led to its indication for use in metastatic and locally advanced PDAC. Additionally, gemcitabine plus cisplatin was noted to have an ORR of 74% in germline BRCA1/2 and PALB2 mutated advanced PDAC. A recent small Phase II study demonstrated the use of the triplet regimen, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin administered on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 21-day cycle as having clinical activity in metastatic PDAC where ORR was 71% with median PFS and median OS of 10.1 months and 16.4 months, respectively. However, it remains unknown whether this triplet regimen is more efficacious than NALIRIFOX. Therefore, investigators propose evaluating whether gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin (mGAP) will lead to greater ORR than NALIRIFOX in previously untreated patients with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC. Of note, despite the high ORR observed with this regimen, 2 of 3 deaths in the study were attributed by the authors to the chemotherapy combination. Due to this toxicity, rather than administering the triplet regimen on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 21-day cycle as done in the Phase Ib/II study, investigators will proceed with Day 1 and Day 15 administration of a 28-day cycle. Investigators hypothesize that gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin will have a greater ORR than NALIRIFOX and lead to improved secondary outcome measurements of BOR, DOR, DCR, PFS, OS, and toxicity profile. Investigators will determine its clinical utility relative to NALIRIFOX in the first-line setting based on standard radiology used to measure treatment response. Findings from this study may have implications for changing the standard of care systemic therapeutic approach in patients with treatment-naïve locally advanced and metastatic PDAC.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGLiposomal Irinotecan50 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
DRUGOxaliplatin60 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
DRUG5-Fluorouracil5-fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 over 46 hours) will begin administration on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
DRUGLeucovorin400 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 of a 2-week cycle
DRUGGemcitabine (mg/m²)1000 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle
DRUGNab-paclitaxel125 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle
DRUGCisplatin25 mg/m2 will be administered on Day 1 and Day 15 of a 4-week cycle

Timeline

Start date
2025-11-07
Primary completion
2028-05-01
Completion
2029-11-01
First posted
2025-07-22
Last updated
2025-11-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07076212. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Evaluating NALIRIFOX vs Modified Gemcitabine, Nab-Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced and Metasta (NCT07076212) · Clinical Trials Directory