Trials / Recruiting
RecruitingNCT07062978
A Comparative Study to Valuating the Efficacy and Safety of QL1206 and Prolia®
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Comparative Study to Valuating the Efficacy and Safety of QL1206 and Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk of Fracture
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 278 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Industry
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 50 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study to valuating the efficacy and safety of QL1206 and Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | QL1206 | QL1206 Denosumab injection(60 mg) was administered subcutaneously once every 6 months for a maximum of 2 consecutive doses throughout the trial. |
| DRUG | Prolia® | Prolia® Denosumab injection(60 mg) was administered subcutaneously once every 6 months for a maximum of 2 consecutive doses throughout the trial. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-06-27
- Primary completion
- 2027-01-01
- Completion
- 2027-01-01
- First posted
- 2025-07-14
- Last updated
- 2025-07-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07062978. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.