Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Enrolling By Invitation

Enrolling By InvitationNCT07061223

SFIB vs PENG Block in the Anesthesia for Total Hip Replacement

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SFIB) and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in the Anesthesia Complex for Total Hip Replacement

Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120 (estimated)
Sponsor
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, National Medical Surgical Center N.A. N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
50 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Total hip replacement is one of the most common orthopedic operations. According to statistical studies, more than 1 million of such surgical interventions are performed annually in the world. The average age of primary hip replacement surgery is 69 y.o. Modern approaches of control of general anesthesia allow safe performance of different surgical interventions under general anesthesia. However, general anesthesia does not have an effective and long-lasting effect on relieving operational stress compared to neuraxial anesthesia. To achieve a similar effect, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of multimodality of anesthesia, and the most promising method is a combination of general and regional anesthesia. peripheral blocks are described in the literature, aimed at analgesia directly in the hip joint area, and effectively used in orthopedics. Most blocks are currently performed under ultrasound control, the risk of nerve damage and accidental intravascular administration of local anesthetics is potentially reduced. It was established that the use of ultrasound guidance reduces the number of attempts and the amount of anesthetic administered, as well as reduces the time required to perform a block. Another predicted effect is a reduction in the doses of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which can cause gastrointestinal bleeding and have a nephrotoxic effect, and can also depress breathing. It should be noted that patients over 65 y.o., have the highest risks of these side effects. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of SFIB and PENG block in hip replacement, as well as evaluation of the effectiveness of combined anesthesia in comparison with general anesthesia without the use of peripheral blocks.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized into three groups group: Group 1: General anesthesia with SFIB In this group, under the ultrasound control, a local anesthetic will be injected into the interfacial space of the iliac muscle, in the area of the passage of the deep artery that surrounds the ilium. The block will be performed over the inguinal fold medial to the upper anterior iliac spine. After ultrasound identification of the needle's location in the interfacial space, 40 ml of a 0.5% solution of Ropivacaine will be administered. Group 2: General anesthesia with PENG block The block is performed using ultrasound navigation. After identifying the ileo-lumbar tendon, 40 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine solution is injected under it. Ropivacaine spreads through the hip joint capsule and blocks small sensitive branches of the femoral and obturator nerves. Group 3: Control group with general inhalation anesthesia The control group will undergo general inhalation anesthesia with bolus intraoperative administration of Fentanyl before particularly traumatic stages. For postoperative pain relief, the patient will have the opportunity to use a fentanyl bolus according to the patient-controled analgesia protocol. The following parameters will be evaluated * Hemodynamic parameters in the intraoperative period * Intraoperative monitoring of basal metabolic rate using indirect calorimetry * Monitoring of glucose levels during the most traumatic stages of surgery * Recording the total dose of opioid analgesics in the perioperative period * Degree of postoperative pain and analgesic therapy administered * Block execution time * Complications of conducting anesthesia * Degree of patient satisfaction with anesthesia

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESFIBThe block technique is based on administration of a local anesthetic under the iliac fascia to block the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves. It is assumed that further leakage of local anesthetic through the interfascial space leads to blocking of the branches of the lumbar plexus in the small pelvis.
PROCEDUREPENG blockThe hip capsule is the main source of pain because the innervation of the joint capsule is a developed network of articular branches of the femoral, sciatic and obturator nerves. The main idea of this technique is to block these branches at the point of common passage between the tendon of the lumbar muscle and the crest of the pubic bone. The block technique is based on administration of a local anesthetic under the ileo-lumbar tendon. Anesthetic spreads through the hip joint capsule and blocks small sensitive branches of the femoral and obturator nerves.
PROCEDUREPatient control analgesiaIn the postoperative period, if pain occurs, the patient will be offered the opportunity to use 20 ug Fentanyl solution bolus according to the patient control analgesia (PCA) without a basic infusion.
PROCEDUREGeneral inhalation anaesthesiaGeneral inhalation anesthesia will be performed in all groups, Desflurane with a minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.6-0.8 will be used for maintenance

Timeline

Start date
2025-07-01
Primary completion
2025-12-30
Completion
2026-06-20
First posted
2025-07-11
Last updated
2025-07-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Russia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07061223. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.