Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT07048184

Sarcoma Surgery Wound Complications Comparing Usual Versus Negative Pressure Dressing

Sarcoma Surgery Wound Complications Comparing Usual Versus Negative Pressure Dressing: a Randomised Phase II Trial

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94 (estimated)
Sponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To compare the differences in clinical outcomes and health economics between standard absorbent dressings versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy dressings following the surgical resection of sarcoma tumours.

Detailed description

The investigators propose to undertake a randomised controlled trial comparing standard absorbent dressings with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressings in the wound management following resection of sarcoma tumours. By using, NPWT in sarcoma patients the investigators aim to reduce the number of patients experiencing wound complications compared to those who receive standard absorbent dressings. 94 participants will be recruited over 12 months and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard or NPWT dressings. The primary aim will be to determine whether there is a clinically significant difference in wound complications between standard dressings and NPWT dressings over a four-month post-op period. The investigators will assess the patient's wound for signs of infection, dehiscence and other potential complications, and document the incidence and severity of complications. Researchers will also collect the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at pre-op and 4 months post-op to understand how the dressings may have impacted function following recovery. In addition, health economic data will also be captured in the form for ED-5D-5L and questionnaires that will focus on the economic impact of surgery and potential wound complications on a patient return to work. Wound complications following sarcoma tumour surgery can be traumatic for patients during their recovery and postpone subsequent chemotherapy treatments, as well as being an expensive burden to the NHS. NPWT dressings may potentially offer benefits to both patients and the NHS yet there is insufficient data available to support widespread use of this product in sarcoma patients. It is the investigators belief that NPWT is used because anecdotally it is believed to be better than standard absorbent dressings. However, there is a clear lack of robust evidence to support this idea, and the investigator aim to address this by undertaking this study..

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICENegative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) DressingsDuring wound closure, skin glue is not permitted as this interferes with the NPWT suction mechanism. The NPWT is a mesh-based dressing that will be applied following the transparent occlusive dressing as per the manufacturer's instructions. Patients assigned to NPWT will have their dressing connected to a suction device (ActiV.A.C.®, KCI) providing a constant negative pressure of 125mmHg and left in situ for between 5 and 7 days. The dressings and suction device are all CE-marked medical devices that are being used within their intended usage.
DEVICEStandard Absorbent DressingsThe wound will be closed as per the standard surgical technique and the operating surgeon's preference. Following wound closure of sarcoma tumour resection, standard absorbent dressing will be applied as per local protocols and the pre-op plan

Timeline

Start date
2025-12-01
Primary completion
2027-02-28
Completion
2027-09-30
First posted
2025-07-02
Last updated
2025-07-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07048184. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Sarcoma Surgery Wound Complications Comparing Usual Versus Negative Pressure Dressing (NCT07048184) · Clinical Trials Directory