Trials / Not Yet Recruiting
Not Yet RecruitingNCT07027189
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection
DECIDE-AI:The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection: A Randomized Controlled Study
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 25 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study aims to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the decision-making process for intervention after caries lesion detection. Participants will be dentists working in the Netherlands randomly divided into two groups. Dentists will be divided into two groups and receive a set of bitewing radiographs, which first will be evaluated with or without AI support according to their group. Participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs and formulate treatment plans accordingly. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, the same radiographs, but in the opposite condition of AI support and again formulate treatment suggestions according to the present caries lesions.
Detailed description
This crossover randomized controlled trial evaluates the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support on dentists' treatment planning following caries detection bitewing radiographs. The study targets clinical decision-making processes by assessing how AI influences diagnostic interpretation and subsequent treatment suggestions. Dentists will be randomly assigned into two study arms. Each participant will evaluate a standardized set of digital bitewing radiographs under two conditions: once with AI assistance and once without, separated by a one-month wash-out period to minimize recall bias. The AI tool provides caries detection prompts based on radiographic analysis but does not suggest treatment. The crossover design enables within-subject comparison, controlling for individual diagnostic thresholds. The radiographs remain constant across both phases to isolate the influence of AI support. The study focuses on diagnostic performance and clinical decision outcomes, both with and without AI support. Treatment decisions are categorized into three predefined levels: no treatment, non-invasive treatment (e.g., fluoride application, polishing, sealing), and invasive intervention (i.e., restorative treatment). Diagnostic accuracy is measured against a reference standard and reported in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Caries detection will be classified using a modified International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS). This study design allows to quantify AI's impact on diagnostic performance, as well as on potential shifts in treatment approach. The study aims to contribute to evidence-based guidance on the integration of AI tools into clinical dental practice.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Artificial intelligence in diagnosis | AI-based diagnostic programs have proved to enhance diagnostic performance, however research on its effects on treatment decisions is scarce. In contrast to other studies focusing on AI's accuracy or the resulting increase in dentists' accuracy, this study aims to investigate the differences in dentists' treatment recommendations when supported by AI versus when they are not during caries detection. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2025-10-02
- Primary completion
- 2026-06-02
- Completion
- 2026-06-02
- First posted
- 2025-06-18
- Last updated
- 2025-06-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Netherlands
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07027189. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.