Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT07025954

Planned Delivery at 37 Versus 36 Weeks in Pregnancies With Placenta Previaand Accreta

Planned Delivery at 37 Versus 36 Weeks in Pregnancies Complicated byPlacenta Previa and Accreta: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600 (estimated)
Sponsor
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Current clinical practice guidelines recommend planned cesarean delivery(CD) at 34-37 weeks of gestation in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta. Preterm birth may lead to neonatal immaturity, while laterCD may increase the risk of severe hemorrhage and surgery complications. Retrospective studies have shown that indicated CD occurs in approximately1/3 of patients before 36 weeks, with the main trigger being antepartum hemorrhage. However, the risk of antepartum hemorrhage is lower after 36 weeks. Recent study showed that delivery shifted from 34-36 weeks to 37 weeks did not increase therisk of maternal intraoperative/postoperative hemorrhage and emergency CD. To further validate this, we propose to conduct a randomized controlled study comparing the effect of planned delivery management strategies at 37 0/7-37 6/7 weeks of gestation with those at 36 0/7-36 6/7 weekson maternal and fetal outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore whether planned delivery up to 37 weeks in pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta improves neonatal outcomes without increasing maternal obstetric risks.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial, which aims to determine the optimal delivery timing for pregnant women with placenta previa and accreta. Participants were stratified by centers and randomly assigned in 1:1 at 28-34 weeks of gestation. Opaque sealed envelopes used to mask randomization sequences. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite neonatal morbidity rate, while the primary safety outcome is intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) during cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of unplanned cesarean delivery, hysterectomy rate, maternal ICU admission, total packed red blood cell transfusion (units), operative duration (hours), surgical complications, unplanned reoperation rate, postpartum morbidity, and neonatal NICU admission. Statistical analyses will be performed based on the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle using the full analysis set (FAS), with a supportive per-protocol (PP) analysis. The statisticians will remain blinded to group assignments through coded data until the final analysis is completed.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURECesarean deliveryAll patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care. Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.

Timeline

Start date
2025-07-12
Primary completion
2027-01-31
Completion
2027-03-01
First posted
2025-06-18
Last updated
2025-07-16

Locations

6 sites across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT07025954. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.