NCT06992557

Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol

Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol in the Mandibular Posterior Area a Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 28 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 21 Years – 60 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

This study aims to evaluate the effect of biological drilling osteotomy protocol compared to conventional osteotomy protocol in delayed implant placement in the posterior mandible regarding implant stability Type of study design: Randomized Clinical Trial In patient indicated for delayed implant placement in the lower posterior mandible will the use of biological drilling protocol osteotomy compared to conventional drilling protocol osteotomy differ regarding implant stability at three months?

Conditions

• Implant Stability
• Low Speed Drilling

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Biological drilling osteotomy protocol	* Osteotomy site preparation through sequential biologic drilling in healed bony site with a pilot drill at 800 rpm with irrigation initiates the drilling process, which is then followed by drills of different sizes and shapes at low speeds at 150rpm without irrigation. * The implant will be positioned in the osteotomy site and a healing collar will be placed.
PROCEDURE	Conventional drilling osteotomy protocol	* Preparation for osteotomy site with conventional sequential drilling in healed bony site at 1200 rpm with irrigation. * The implant will be positioned in the osteotomy site and a healing collar will be placed.

Timeline

• Start date: 2025-06-01
• Primary completion: 2026-01-01
• Completion: 2026-01-01
• First posted: 2025-05-28
• Last updated: 2025-05-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt