Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Enrolling By Invitation

Enrolling By InvitationNCT06988202

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Repeat Ablation After Failed Initial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
630 (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Rochester · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of irregular heartbeat doctors see. People with AF sometimes have a procedure called an ablation to help get their heart back into a normal rhythm. However, this treatment doesn't always work. This study is looking at whether adding an extra step to the usual ablation-specifically treating another area of the heart called the left atrial (LA) posterior wall-can help people feel better overall, compared to just repeating the standard pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREPulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) without Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation (PWI)A doctor inserts a thin, flexible tube (called a catheter) through a blood vessel, usually in the groin, and guides it to the heart. Once the catheter is in place, the doctor uses pulsed field electroporation, heat (radiofrequency) or cold (cryoablation) to create small scars in the area where the pulmonary veins connect to the left atrium of the heart. These scars block the faulty electrical signals that cause AF, helping the heart maintain a normal rhythm.
PROCEDUREPulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) with Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation (PWI)PVI with an additional step where the doctor also isolates the back wall (posterior wall) of the left atrium.

Timeline

Start date
2026-03-18
Primary completion
2030-01-01
Completion
2031-12-31
First posted
2025-05-23
Last updated
2026-03-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06988202. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.