Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT06986707

Strain Counterstrain Technique and Graston Technqiue on Quadratus Lumborum Trigger Points

Comparative Effects of Strain Counterstrain Technique and Graston Technique on Trigger Points of Quadratus Lumborum Among Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34 (estimated)
Sponsor
Riphah International University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Poor body mechanics and posture affects body positioning and stresses quadratus lumborum muscle which ultimately leads to myofascial trigger points in muscle. This study aims to compare the effects of Strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique on trigger points of quadratus lumborum in nonspecific low back patients. This study will be a randomized controlled trial and will be conducted in Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic Lahore and SPARC Physiotherapy Clinic Lahore. Non-probability convenient sampling will be used to collect the data. Sample size of 34 subjects with age group between 20-45 years will be taken. baseline and after 4 weeks. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 25.

Detailed description

Researches have been conducted about effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus kinesiotape for chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Introduction. The objective was to compare the effect of conventional program, instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and kinesiotape (KT) in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP). 51 participants were randomly enrolled into three equal groups. Group A (n = 17) received conventional program, Group B (n = 17) received conventional program plus IASTM, and Group C (n = 17) received conventional program plus KT. The participants were evaluated before and after eight sessions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pressure algometer, dual inclinometer, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It was concluded that Conventional program, IASTM and KT are effective methods for improving pain, ROM and function on CMLBP..Low back pain especially which is not related to any specific disease has become very common nowadays. Almost every other person complains about back pain. While there have been numerous studies on low back pain and its treatments but limited work has done on both techniques, the strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique. This study aims to determine the comparison of strain counterstrain technique and Graston technique on trigger points of quadratus lumborum among patients with non-specific low back pain

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERStrain counterstrain techniqueGroup A: Conventional treatment will be given for 45 minutes (repeated 2 sets in each session) * 1 day per week * 4 weeks protocol
OTHERGraston techniqueGROUP B: Conventional treatment will be given for 45 minutes Before starting procedure, brisk walking or stretching is done for 4- 5 minutes * Applying heat for 3-4 minutes to warm the area * 40 seconds on right side * 40 seconds on left side * 1 day per week * 4 weeks protocol After treatment, apply Ice for 2 minutes

Timeline

Start date
2025-06-12
Primary completion
2025-09-01
Completion
2025-12-01
First posted
2025-05-23
Last updated
2025-07-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Pakistan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06986707. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.