NCT06977789

Comparison of Holter vs S-Patch for Arrhythmia Detection in Older Falls Patient

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 73 (actual)
• Sponsor: Changi General Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 60 Years – 120 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare Holter versus S patch in a group of elderly patients who are referred to the Geriatrics service in Changi General Hospital for falls from Accident and Emergency department, clinic and wards. The investigator hope to assess the feasibility, adherence and patient acceptability as an alternative to Holter monitoring. The investigator also hope to learn if S-Patch EX monitoring system can be as effective or equivalent to Holter in the monitoring of arrhythmias and the possibility of deploying it for longer term monitoring of arrhythmias. Participants who consented to be in this study will be offered S patch and Holter consecutively. Holter will be worn for 24 hours and S patch will be worn for 72 hours. The order which Holter or S patch will be worn first will be determined via randomisation.

Conditions

• Bradyarrhythmia
• Arrythmia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex	S Patch3-Cardio/S-Patch Ex for 72 hours
DEVICE	Holter	Holter for 24 hours

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-07-03
• Primary completion: 2023-07-31
• Completion: 2023-12-25
• First posted: 2025-05-18
• Last updated: 2025-05-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Singapore