Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Not Yet Recruiting

Not Yet RecruitingNCT06976905

Myoma Screw in Manipulation of Large Uterus in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34 (estimated)
Sponsor
Kafrelsheikh University · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
30 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

To compare between myoma screw and uterine manipulator in manipulation of large uterus in total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Detailed description

Hysterectomy is performed on 1,500,000 women worldwide each year to treat benign disorders such leiomyoma, prolapse, and irregular bleeding, as well as gynecologic malignancies. Prior to the introduction of the first laparoscopic procedures in the late 1980s, hysterectomy was traditionally accomplished by laparotomy or the vaginal route. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) became the most commonly used hysterectomy technique in the last ten years, especially in developed nations, because laparoscopic hysterectomy has some advantages over other hysterectomy types, including high patient satisfaction, an earlier return to work, less blood loss, the ability to diagnose and treat other pelvic diseases, and the ability to maintain thorough intraperitoneal haemostasis. However, there are some drawbacks to TLH as well, such as its expensive cost, lengthier operating time, and requirement for advanced technological instruments including uterine manipulators (UM) and sealing devices. In order to facilitate colpotomy by defining the cervicovaginal junction and enable safer dissection around the cervix, the main goal of utilising a UM is to extend the distance between the cervix and ureter.There isn't enough clinical data in the literature to say whether using UM meets these expectations, though.Additionally, the use of UMs has been linked to a number of specific problems, such as uterine rupture, intestinal perforation, and vaginal wall laceration.UMs are also not appropriate in certain cases, such as vaginal stenosis, anatomical differences that make it difficult to identify the uterus or cervix, and patients who refuse vaginal penetration because they are virgins. There is still no "optimal UM" that is consistently safe, effective, and economical, despite the fact that numerous UMs have been developed in recent decades. Some studies have suggested alternatives including the use of certain sutures, gripping forceps, or myoma screws (MS) as answers to the issues that arise with the use of UM. When performing a myomectomy using the vaginal method, laparotomy, or laparoscopy, the MS is a conventional, reusable instrument. MSs are renowned for their ability to deliver a powerful three-dimensional traction force. Additionally, using MS does not require specialised knowledge like UMs do.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURETotal laparoscopic hysterectomyHysterectomy by laparoscope using uterine manipulator or myoma screw as a manipulator of large uterus

Timeline

Start date
2025-05-01
Primary completion
2025-05-01
Completion
2025-06-01
First posted
2025-05-16
Last updated
2025-05-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT06976905. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.